In the context of arguments, what does "victory by definition" mean?

In the context of arguments, what does "victory by definition" mean?

• A. Deciding what is true based on one's own definitions
• B. Forcing an opponent to accept a conclusion without discussion
• C. Presenting evidence in favor of a point
• D. Using personal anecdotes to support a claim

Answer: (A)

"Victory by definition" refers to the strategy where an individual claims success or truthfulness based on their own specific definitions of terms or concepts, rather than engaging in a logical debate or providing substantial evidence. This tactic often involves framing the discussion in such a way that one's own definitions favor their position, skirting around the complexity of the argument or dismissing alternative perspectives. By establishing a definition that aligns with their viewpoint, the person effectively limits the scope of the argument, making it difficult for others to counter or challenge their assertion. This methodology highlights an aspect of rhetorical strategy, where the focus is more on who sets the terms of the debate rather than on objectively evaluating the validity of the claims being made.

"Victory by definition" refers to the strategy where an individual claims success or truthfulness based on their own specific definitions of terms or concepts, rather than engaging in a logical debate or providing substantial evidence. This tactic often involves framing the discussion in such a way that one's own definitions favor their position, skirting around the complexity of the argument or dismissing alternative perspectives.

By establishing a definition that aligns with their viewpoint, the person effectively limits the scope of the argument, making it difficult for others to counter or challenge their assertion. This methodology highlights an aspect of rhetorical strategy, where the focus is more on who sets the terms of the debate rather than on objectively evaluating the validity of the claims being made.