In the discussion about Wilt Chamberlain and Dennis Rodman, what type of argument is made based on irrelevant characteristics?

In the discussion about Wilt Chamberlain and Dennis Rodman, what type of argument is made based on irrelevant characteristics?

• A. Disproving a Minor Point
• B. Inconsequent Argument
• C. Appeal to Ignorance
• D. Ad Hominem

Answer: (B)

The argument made based on irrelevant characteristics in the context of Wilt Chamberlain and Dennis Rodman can be classified as an inconsequent argument. This type of argument occurs when a point is raised that may not directly relate to the main topic or claim but instead highlights characteristics or attributes that do not contribute to the validity of the argument being debated. In this case, focusing on aspects of Chamberlain's or Rodman's personal lives, such as their style, appearance, or other unrelated traits, distracts from the essential discussion about their basketball skills or achievements. This diversion does not substantively impact the argument regarding their contributions to the sport. Therefore, identifying irrelevant characteristics that do not support the central argument exemplifies an inconsequent argument, as it fails to engage with the actual issues at hand.

The argument made based on irrelevant characteristics in the context of Wilt Chamberlain and Dennis Rodman can be classified as an inconsequent argument. This type of argument occurs when a point is raised that may not directly relate to the main topic or claim but instead highlights characteristics or attributes that do not contribute to the validity of the argument being debated.

In this case, focusing on aspects of Chamberlain's or Rodman's personal lives, such as their style, appearance, or other unrelated traits, distracts from the essential discussion about their basketball skills or achievements. This diversion does not substantively impact the argument regarding their contributions to the sport. Therefore, identifying irrelevant characteristics that do not support the central argument exemplifies an inconsequent argument, as it fails to engage with the actual issues at hand.