What logical technique is illustrated by suggesting a person must be power crazed based on their actions or proposals?

What logical technique is illustrated by suggesting a person must be power crazed based on their actions or proposals?

• A. Ad Hominem
• B. Disproving a Minor Point
• C. Inconsequent Argument
• D. Appeal to Ignorance

Answer: (A)

The logical technique illustrated by suggesting that a person is power crazed based solely on their actions or proposals is indeed an Ad Hominem argument. This technique occurs when someone attacks the character or motives of an individual instead of engaging with the substance of their argument or position. By labeling someone as “power crazed,” the focus shifts from addressing the actual proposals or actions that person has made to a personal attack that undermines their credibility. This approach distracts from the merits of the argument being presented and instead seeks to discredit the source of the argument based on assumed flaws in their character. Therefore, it becomes a tactic that aims to provoke an emotional response rather than encourage logical discourse, effectively exemplifying the Ad Hominem fallacy.

The logical technique illustrated by suggesting that a person is power crazed based solely on their actions or proposals is indeed an Ad Hominem argument. This technique occurs when someone attacks the character or motives of an individual instead of engaging with the substance of their argument or position.

By labeling someone as “power crazed,” the focus shifts from addressing the actual proposals or actions that person has made to a personal attack that undermines their credibility. This approach distracts from the merits of the argument being presented and instead seeks to discredit the source of the argument based on assumed flaws in their character. Therefore, it becomes a tactic that aims to provoke an emotional response rather than encourage logical discourse, effectively exemplifying the Ad Hominem fallacy.