What type of argument is derived from the conclusion being based solely on the definition of terms?

What type of argument is derived from the conclusion being based solely on the definition of terms?

• A. Victory by Definition
• B. Begging the Question
• C. Appeal to Ignorance
• D. Leading Question

Answer: (A)

Victory by Definition is a type of argument where the conclusion is reached solely based on the definitions of the terms involved. This method often relies on the precise meanings of words to assert a conclusion that seems logical and sound, simply because the terms themselves direct listeners to that conclusion without requiring any additional evidence or reasoning. For example, stating that "All bachelors are unmarried men" concludes that "John is a bachelor, therefore John is an unmarried man" relies strictly on the definitions of 'bachelor' and 'unmarried man' to arrive at the conclusion. This approach can simplify debates or discussions but might leave important nuances or contexts unaddressed, leading to potential oversimplification in more complex issues. Consequently, the distinction from other argument types, such as begging the question, which assumes the truth of its conclusion within its premises, or appeal to ignorance, which states a claim is true because it has not been proven false, highlights the unique nature of Victory by Definition in its reliance on the definitions themselves as the sole basis for the conclusion.

Victory by Definition is a type of argument where the conclusion is reached solely based on the definitions of the terms involved. This method often relies on the precise meanings of words to assert a conclusion that seems logical and sound, simply because the terms themselves direct listeners to that conclusion without requiring any additional evidence or reasoning.

For example, stating that "All bachelors are unmarried men" concludes that "John is a bachelor, therefore John is an unmarried man" relies strictly on the definitions of 'bachelor' and 'unmarried man' to arrive at the conclusion.

This approach can simplify debates or discussions but might leave important nuances or contexts unaddressed, leading to potential oversimplification in more complex issues. Consequently, the distinction from other argument types, such as begging the question, which assumes the truth of its conclusion within its premises, or appeal to ignorance, which states a claim is true because it has not been proven false, highlights the unique nature of Victory by Definition in its reliance on the definitions themselves as the sole basis for the conclusion.