Which of the following best describes a "complex question" fallacy?

Which of the following best describes a "complex question" fallacy?

• A. Embedding a presumption in a question that limits the response
• B. Only allowing limited options in an argument
• C. Focusing solely on the issue of trust without discussing the main point
• D. Asking multiple questions that lead to a specific response

Answer: (A)

A "complex question" fallacy occurs when a question is framed in such a way that it contains an unjustified presumption or assumption that restricts the range of possible responses. When a question is designed this way, it can manipulate the response by embedding certain beliefs or ideas within it, which the respondent must accept in order to answer. This type of questioning can lead to misleading conclusions or force individuals into a position they may not actually agree with. For instance, if someone were to ask, "Have you stopped cheating on your exams?" the question presupposes that the person did cheat before, putting them in a difficult position where they must acknowledge a situation they may not have engaged in. This makes it an effective example of the complex question fallacy, as it limits the possible responses of the person being questioned and can illicit a defensive or inconclusive reply. The other answer choices, while they represent different types of logical fallacies or rhetorical techniques, do not capture the essence of what makes a complex question fallacy unique. Focusing solely on trust, for instance, modifies the discussion but does not impose unwarranted presuppositions. Likewise, presenting limited options and asking multiple questions can shape a dialogue, but they do not necessarily entail

A "complex question" fallacy occurs when a question is framed in such a way that it contains an unjustified presumption or assumption that restricts the range of possible responses. When a question is designed this way, it can manipulate the response by embedding certain beliefs or ideas within it, which the respondent must accept in order to answer. This type of questioning can lead to misleading conclusions or force individuals into a position they may not actually agree with.

For instance, if someone were to ask, "Have you stopped cheating on your exams?" the question presupposes that the person did cheat before, putting them in a difficult position where they must acknowledge a situation they may not have engaged in. This makes it an effective example of the complex question fallacy, as it limits the possible responses of the person being questioned and can illicit a defensive or inconclusive reply.

The other answer choices, while they represent different types of logical fallacies or rhetorical techniques, do not capture the essence of what makes a complex question fallacy unique. Focusing solely on trust, for instance, modifies the discussion but does not impose unwarranted presuppositions. Likewise, presenting limited options and asking multiple questions can shape a dialogue, but they do not necessarily entail