Which statement illustrates the fallacy of 'Begging the Question'?

Which statement illustrates the fallacy of 'Begging the Question'?

• A. I deserve an A because I am a good student.
• B. Isn't it obvious they care for each other?
• C. If nobody has proven it wrong, it must be true.
• D. He will not succeed due to his background.

Answer: (A)

The statement that illustrates the fallacy of 'Begging the Question' is the claim, "I deserve an A because I am a good student." This fallacy occurs when an argument's premise assumes the truth of the conclusion instead of supporting it. In this case, saying that someone deserves an A because they are a good student simply restates the question without providing any evidence or reasoning as to why being a good student warrants an A. The reasoning is circular; it assumes what it intends to prove—that being a good student automatically equates to deserving a high grade—without offering any additional justification for that assumption. This lack of independent support showcases the essence of the fallacy, which relies on the conclusion being accepted without proper evidence. Other statements do not create this same circular reasoning. They may possess various forms of logical flaws, but they do not inherently assume their conclusions in the way that the first statement does.

The statement that illustrates the fallacy of 'Begging the Question' is the claim, "I deserve an A because I am a good student." This fallacy occurs when an argument's premise assumes the truth of the conclusion instead of supporting it. In this case, saying that someone deserves an A because they are a good student simply restates the question without providing any evidence or reasoning as to why being a good student warrants an A.

The reasoning is circular; it assumes what it intends to prove—that being a good student automatically equates to deserving a high grade—without offering any additional justification for that assumption. This lack of independent support showcases the essence of the fallacy, which relies on the conclusion being accepted without proper evidence.

Other statements do not create this same circular reasoning. They may possess various forms of logical flaws, but they do not inherently assume their conclusions in the way that the first statement does.